O-RADS MRI scoring system: key points for correct application in inexperienced hands.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the O-RADS MRI criteria in the stratification of risk of malignancy of solid or sonographically indeterminate ovarian masses and assess the interobserver agreement of this classification between experienced and inexperienced radiologists. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included patients from 2019 to 2022 with sonographically indeterminate or solid ovarian masses who underwent MRI with a specific protocol for characterisation according to O-RADS MRI specifications. Each study was evaluated using O-RADS lexicon by two radiologists, one with 17 years of experience in gynaecological radiology and another with 4 years of experience in general radiology. Findings were classified as benign, borderline, or malignant according to histology or stability over time. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with US indeterminate or solid adnexal masses were included. Fifty-seven (31%) did not have ovarian masses, classified as O-RADS 1. The diagnostic performance for scores 2-5 was excellent with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 97.4%, 100%, 96.2%, and 100%, respectively by the experienced radiologist and 96.1%, 92.0%, 93.9%, and 94.8% by the inexperienced radiologist. Interobserver concordance was very high (Kappa index 0.92). Almost all the misclassified cases were due to misinterpretation of the classification similar to reports in the literature. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of O-RADS MRI determined by either experienced or inexperienced radiologists is excellent, facilitating decision-making with high diagnostic accuracy and high reproducibility. Knowledge of this classification and use of assessment tools could avoid frequent errors due to misinterpretation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Up to 31% of ovarian masses are considered indeterminate by transvaginal US and 32% of solid lesions considered malignant by transvaginal US are benign. The O-RADs MRI accurately classifies these masses, even when used by inexperienced radiologists, thereby avoiding incorrect surgical approaches. KEY POINTS: • O-RADS MRI accurately classifies indeterminate and solid ovarian masses by ultrasound. • There is excellent interobserver agreement between experienced and non-experienced radiologists. • O-RADS MRI is a helpful tool to assess clinical decision-making in ovarian tumours.

Creatine Kinase Elevation in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Patients on Tolvaptan Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary cause of end-stage kidney disease. Currently, tolvaptan is the only treatment that has proven to delay disease progression. The most notable side effect of this therapy is drug-induced liver injury; however, recently, there have been two reports of creatine kinase (CK) elevation in ADPKD patients on tolvaptan treatment. We set out to monitor and determine the actual incidence of CK elevation and evaluate its potential association with other clinical factors. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective multicenter study performed in rapidly progressive ADPKD patients on tolvaptan treatment from Barcelona, Spain. Laboratory tests, demographics, treatment dose, and reported symptoms were collected from October 2018 to March 2021. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients initiated tolvaptan treatment during follow-up. The medication had to be discontinued in 31 (32.6%) patients, primarily due to aquaretic effects (12.6%), elevated liver enzymes (8.4%), and symptomatic or persistently elevated CK levels (3.2%). Moreover, a total of 27 (28.4%) patients had elevated CK levels, with most of them being either transient (12.6%), mild and asymptomatic (4.2%), or resolved after dose reduction (3.2%) or temporary discontinuation (2.1%). CONCLUSION: We pre-sent the largest cohort that has monitored CK levels in a real-life setting, finding them elevated in 28.4% of patients. More research and monitoring will help us understand the clinical implications and the pathophysiological mechanism of CK elevation in this population.

Oral hydration as a safe prophylactic measure to prevent post-contrast acute kidney injury in oncologic patients with chronic kidney disease (IIIb) referred for contrast-enhanced computed tomography: subanalysis of the oncological group of the NICIR study.

BACKGROUND: T he objective of this study is to evaluate oral hydration compared to intravenous (i.v.) hydration in the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in the oncologic subgroup of patients with stage IIIb chronic kidney disease (CKD) included in the NICIR study referred for elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective subanalysis of the oncological subgroup (174/228 patients, 74%) from a continuous prospective database of patients included in the recently published non-inferiority NICIR study. Patients received prophylaxis against PC-AKI with either oral hydration (500 mL of water 2 h before and 2000 mL during the 24 h after CE-CT) or i.v. hydration (sodium bicarbonate (166 mmol/L) 3 mL/kg/h starting 1 h before and 1 mL/kg/h during the first hour after CE-CT). The primary outcome was to compare the proportion of PC-AKI in the first 48 to 72 h after CE-CT in the two hydration groups. Secondary outcomes were to compare persistent PC-AKI, the need for haemodialysis, and the occurrence of adverse events related to prophylaxis in each group. RESULTS: Of 174 patients included in the subanalysis, 82 received oral hydration and 92 received i.v. hydration. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics or risk factors between the two study arms. Overall the PC-AKI rate was 4.6% (8/174 patients), being 3.7% in the oral hydration arm (3/82 patients) and 5.4% (5/92 patients) in the i.v. hydration arm. The persistent PC-AKI rate was 1.2% (1/82 patients) in the oral hydration arm and 3.3% (3/92 patients) in the i.v. hydration arm. No patient required dialysis during the first month after CE-CT or had adverse effects related to the hydration regime. CONCLUSION: In oncological patients with stage IIIb CKD referred for elective CE-CT, the rate of PC-AKI in those receiving oral hydration did not significantly differ from that of patients receiving i.v. hydration.

Effect of Intranodally Administered Dendritic Cell-Based HIV Vaccine in Combination With Pegylated Interferon α-2a on Viral Control Following ART Discontinuation: A Phase 2A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Functional cure has been proposed as an alternative to lifelong antiretroviral therapy and therapeutic vaccines represent one of the most promising approaches. Materials and Methods: We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and effect on viral dynamics of a therapeutic vaccine produced with monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MD-DC) loaded with a high dose of heat-inactivated autologous (HIA) HIV-1 in combination with pegylated interferon alpha 2a (IFNα-2a) in people with chronic HIV-1. Results: Twenty-nine male individuals on successful ART and with CD4+ ≥450 cells/mm3 were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive three ultrasound-guided inguinal intranodal immunizations, one every 2 weeks: (1) vaccine ~107 MD-DC pulsed with HIA-HIV-1 (1010 HIV RNA copies) (n = 8); (2) vaccine plus three doses of 180 mcg IFNα-2a at weeks 4-6 (n = 6); (3) placebo = saline (n = 7); and (4) placebo plus three doses of 180 mcg IFNα-2a (n = 8). Thereafter, treatment was interrupted (ATI). Vaccines, IFNα-2a, and the administration procedures were safe and well tolerated. All patients' viral load rebounded during the 12-week ATI period. According to groups, changes in viral set-point between pre-ART and during ATI were not significant. When comparing all groups, there was a tendency in changes in viral set-point between the vaccine group vs. vaccine + IFNα-2a group (>0.5log10p = 0.05). HIV-1-specific T-cell responses (IFN-Æ´ Elispot) were higher at baseline in placebo than in the vaccine group (2,259 ± 535 vs. 900 ± 200 SFC/106 PBMC, p = 0.028). A significant difference in the change of specific T-cell responses was only observed at week 4 between vaccine and placebo groups (694 ± 327 vs. 1,718 ± 282 SFC/106 PBMC, p = 0.04). No effect on T-cell responses or changes in viral reservoir were observed after INFα-2a administration. Discussion: Results from this study show that intranodally administered DC therapeutic vaccine in combination with IFNα-2a was safe and well-tolerated but had a minimal impact on viral dynamics in HIV-1 chronic infected participants. Clinical Trial Registration: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), identifier NCT02767193.

Clinical and radiological findings for small renal masses under active surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the experience performing active surveillance (AS) of small renal masses (SRMs) in our center and to correlate the evolution of SRMs under AS with clinical and radiological findings. METHODS: Patients on AS between January 2012 until May 2020 for SRMs in our center have been included. Growth rate (GR) per year was analyzed and correlated with radiographic features. Patients with growth kinetics higher than 5mm/year during follow up were offered active treatment. RESULTS: 73 patients were included in AS: the mean age was 75.7 years, a mean initial tumour size of 21.2 mm, and a mean growth rate of 2.05 mm/year. Around 60 % had an ASA score of 3. The tumor size did not change over time in 43% of cases; in 4% we noticed a regression in size and in 52% of cases growth during follow-up (38% 1-5mm/year and 14% more than 5 mm/year). Delayed active treatment was indicated in 16 (21%) of cases. Treatment applied was as following: 2 radiofrequency ablations, 6 radical and 8 partial nephrectomies. A weak correlation was found between initial size and growth rate (r = 0.38, P = 0.02). No significant association was detected regarding any of the analyzed radiological findings and GR. With a mean follow up time of 33 months none of the patients presented metastatic progression. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance is a feasible option for management of SRMs in selected patients without jeopardizing oncological safety. In our series, no clinical or radiological characteristics for predicting tumour growth were found.

Oncological Results of Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Should We Really Abandon Minimally Invasive Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence indicates that some minimally invasive surgery approaches, such as laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy, offer lower survival rates to patients with early-stage cervical cancer than open radical hysterectomy. We evaluated the oncological results of a different minimally invasive surgery approach, that of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) in this setting. METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2018, patients with early-stage cervical cancer were treated by LARVH. Colpotomy and initial closure of the vagina were performed following the Schauta operation, avoiding manipulation of the tumor. Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was performed in all cases. Women treated between 2001 and 2011 also underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: There were 115 patients included. Intraoperative complications occurred in nine patients (7.8%). After a median follow-up of 87.8 months (range 1-216), seven women (6%) presented recurrence. Four women died (mortality rate 3.4%). The 3- and 4.5-year disease-free survival rates were 96.7% and 93.5%, respectively, and the overall survival was 97.8% and 94.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: LARVH offers excellent disease-free and overall survival in women with early-stage cervical cancer and can be considered as an adequate minimally invasive surgery alternative to open radical hysterectomy.

Susceptibility artifacts and PIRADS 3 lesions in prostatic MRI: how often is the dynamic contrast-enhance sequence necessary?

PURPOSE: To assess the need of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequence in addition to T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the presence of artifacts associated with rectal gas (which compromise the diffusion assessment) and/or PIRADS 3 lesions. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was not required. Patients referred consecutively over a period of 5 months for elevated PSA underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). mpMRI was performed using a 3T MRI system without an endorectal coil. The MRI findings were reviewed by two radiologists and were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2). Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. For statistical purposes, lesions were classified as PIRADS 1-2, PIRADS 3, or PIRADS 4-5. First, all studies were reviewed using a biparametric assessment (T2-WI + DWI), and the presence or absence of susceptibility artifacts was assessed for each prostate. Subsequently, all images were analyzed using the standard multiparametric approach (T2-WI + DWI + DCE). RESULTS: The biparametric evaluation (T2-WI + DWI) showed artifacts (due to the presence of rectal gas or other) in 87 patients (43.5%) and no artifacts in 113 patients (56.5%). In the latter group, 15 patients had peripheral zone (PZ) PIRADS 3 lesions. Thus, a total of 102 patients (51%) had artifacts or PZ PIRADS 3 lesions and therefore required DCE. When evaluating the group of prostates without artifacts, 13.3% of prostates required DCE. A total of 17 (23.9%) PIRADS 4-5 prostate lesions would have not been detected without the use of DCE. CONCLUSION: Biparametric evaluation of the prostate revealed some limitation due to the presence of artifacts or PIRADS 3 PZ lesions. Artifacts were present in almost 44% of our patients, but when the DWI was correctly evaluated, only 13.3% of prostates required DCE.

Oral hydration compared to intravenous hydration in the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease stage IIIb: A phase III non-inferiority study (NICIR study).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the non-inferiority of oral hydration compared to intravenous (i.v.) hydration in the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in patients with stage IIIb chronic kidney disease (CKD) referred for an elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, phase 3, parallel-group, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive prophylaxis against PC-AKI either with oral hydration: 500 mL of water two hours before and 2000 mL during the 24 h after performing CE-CT or i.v. hydration: sodium bicarbonate (166 mmol/L) 3 mL/kg/h starting one hour before and sodium bicarbonate (166 mmol/L) 1 mL/kg/h during the first hour after CE-CT. 100 mL of non-ionic iodinated contrast was administered in all cases. The primary outcome was the proportion of PC-AKI in the first 48-72 h after CE-CT. Secondary outcomes were persistent PC-AKI, the need for hemodialysis, and the occurrence of adverse events related to prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of 264 patients randomized between January 2018 and January 2019, 114 received oral hydration, and 114 received i.v. hydration and were evaluable. No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between arms in clinical characteristics or risk factors. PC-AKI rate was 4.4 % (95 %CI: 1.4-9.9 %) in the oral hydration arm and 5.3 % (95 %CI: 2.0-11.1%) in the i.v. hydration arm. The persistent PC-AKI rate was 1.8 % (95 %CI: 0.2-6.2 %) in both arms. No patient required dialysis during the first month after CE-CT or had adverse effects related to the hydration regime. CONCLUSION: In those with stage IIIb CKD referred for an elective CE-CT, we provide evidence of non-inferiority of oral hydration compared to i.v. hydration in the prevention of PC-AKI.

Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses.

The detection of a renal mass is a relatively frequent occurrence in the daily practice of any Radiology Department. The diagnostic approaches depend on whether the lesion is cystic or solid. Cystic lesions can be managed using the Bosniak classification, while management of solid lesions depends on whether the lesion is well-defined or infiltrative. The approach to well-defined lesions focuses mainly on the differentiation between renal cancer and benign tumors such as angiomyolipoma (AML) and oncocytoma. Differential diagnosis of infiltrative lesions is wider, including primary and secondary malignancies and inflammatory disease, and knowledge of the patient history is essential. Radiologists may establish a possible differential diagnosis based on the imaging features of the renal masses and the clinical history. The aim of this review is to present the contribution of the different imaging techniques and image guided biopsies in the diagnostic management of cystic and solid renal lesions.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS.

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS.

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Usefulness of multidetector computed tomography to differentiate between renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. A model validation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to validate a multivariable predictive model previously developed to differentiate between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and oncocytoma using CT parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 100 renal lesions with final diagnosis of RCC or oncocytoma studied before surgery with 4-phase multidetector CT (MDCT). We evaluated the characteristics of the tumors and the enhancement patterns at baseline, arterial, nephrographic and excretory MDCT phases. RESULTS: Histopathologically 15 tumors were oncocytomas and 85 RCCs. RCCs were significantly larger (median 4.4 cm vs 2.8 cm, p = 0.006). There were significant differences in nodule attenuation in the excretory phase compared to baseline (median: 31 vs 42, p = 0.015), with RCCs having lower values. Heterogeneous enhancement patterns were also more frequent in RCCs (85.9% vs 60%, p = 0.027).Multivariable analysis showed that the independent predictors of malignancy were the enhancement pattern, with oncocytomas being more homogeneous in the nephrographic phase [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.75, p = 0.02)], nodule enhancement in the excretory phase compared to baseline, with RCCs showing lower enhancement [OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99, p = 0.005)], and a size > 4 cm, with RCCs being larger [OR 5.89 (95% CI 1.10 to 31.58), p = 0.038]. CONCLUSION: The multivariable predictive model previously developed which combines different MDCT parameters, including lesion size > 4 cm, lesion enhancement in the excretory phase compared to baseline and enhancement heterogeneity, can be successfully applied to distinguish RCC from oncocytoma. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study confirms that multiparametric assessment using MDCT (including parameters such as size, homogeneity and enhancement differences between the excretory and the baseline phases) can help distinguish between RCCs and oncocytomas. While it is true that this multiparametric predictive model may not always correctly classify renal tumors such as RCC or oncocytoma, it can be used to determine which patients would benefit from pre-surgical biopsy to confirm that the tumor is in fact an oncocytoma, and thereby avoid unnecessary surgical treatments.

Active surveillance of small renal masses.

Most renal masses incidentally detected by cross-sectional images are benign, being mainly cysts, and if they are malignant, they are indolent in nature with limited metastatic potential. Enhanced renal masses less than 4 cm in size are known as small renal masses (SRMs), and their growth rate (GR) and the possibility of developing metastasis are extremely low. Delayed intervention of SRMs by closed and routine imaging follow-up known as active surveillance (AS) is now an option according to urological guidelines. Radiologists have a key position in AS management of SRMs even unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) and also in the follow-up of complex renal cysts by Bosniak cyst classification system. Radiologists play a key role in the AS of both unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) SRMs as well as in the follow-up of complex renal cysts using the Bosniak cyst classification system. Indeed, radiologists must determine which patients with SRMs or complex renal cysts can be included in AS, establish the follow-up radiological test algorithm to be used in different scenarios, perform measurements in follow-up tests, and decide when AS should be discontinued. The purpose of this article is to review the indications and management of AS in SRMs, especially focused on specific scenarios, such as complex renal cysts and multifocal renal tumors (sporadic or hereditary). In this work, the authors aimed to provide a thorough review of imaging in the context of active surveillance of renal masses.

Differentiation of Upper Urinary Tract Lesions Using MDCT: Benign Vs Malignant.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) in differentiating benign and malignant lesions of upper urinary tract (UUT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with 55 suspected UUT lesions were included in the study. All patients underwent MDCT scan with nephrographic and excretory phases. The unenhanced phase was also performed in 38 cases. The final diagnosis was made by histology in 48 lesions: 43-after surgery, 5-after biopsy and by MDCT follow-up over at least 15 months in the remaining 7 lesions. The following CT features were evaluated: number of lesions, lesion appearance (mass or wall thickening), presence of calcifications, internal border appearance (smooth or irregular), and size and enhancement (presence or absence). The relationship between imaging characteristics and pathology (benign vs malignant) was assessed with logistic regression, univariable diagnostic accuracy, and with classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: Patients with mass morphology had a significantly higher probability of malignancy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.73, 95%CI: 1.02-13.72, p = 0.047) compared to patients with thickened wall morphology. The presence of an irregular internal border was also significantly associated with malignancy (OR: 12.14, 95%CI: 2.95-50.06, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found between malignancy and lesion size (p = 0.29), calcifications (p = 0.93) or enhancement (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Mass morphology and irregular internal border are reliable signs to suggest malignancy in UUT lesions.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version).

The updated version of the EFSUMB guidelines on the application of non-hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) deals with the use of microbubble ultrasound contrast outside the liver in the many established and emerging applications.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Short Version).

The updated version of the EFSUMB guidelines on the application of non-hepatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) deals with the use of microbubble ultrasound contrast outside the liver in the many established and emerging applications.

Infection prevention and control in ultrasound - best practice recommendations from the European Society of Radiology Ultrasound Working Group.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of these recommendations is to highlight the importance of infection prevention and control in ultrasound (US), including diagnostic and interventional settings. METHODS: Review of available publications and discussion within a multidisciplinary group consistent of radiologists and microbiologists, in consultation with European patient and industry representatives. RECOMMENDATIONS: Good basic hygiene standards are essential. All US equipment must be approved prior to first use, including hand held devices. Any equipment in direct patient contact must be cleaned and disinfected prior to first use and after every examination. Regular deep cleaning of the entire US machine and environment should be undertaken. Faulty transducers should not be used. As outlined in presented flowcharts, low level disinfection is sufficient for standard US on intact skin. For all other minor and major interventional procedures as well as all endo-cavity US, high level disinfection is mandatory. Dedicated transducer covers must be used when transducers are in contact with mucous membranes or body fluids and sterile gel should be used inside and outside covers. CONCLUSIONS: Good standards of basic hygiene and thorough decontamination of all US equipment as well as appropriate use of US gel and transducer covers are essential to keep patients safe. MAIN MESSAGES: • Transducers must be cleaned/disinfected before first use and after every examination. • Low level disinfection is sufficient for standard US on intact skin. • High level disinfection is mandatory for endo-cavity US and all interventions. • Dedicated transducer covers must be used for endo-cavity US and all interventions. • Sterile gel should be used for all endo-cavity US and all interventions.

Serum osteoprotegerin in prevalent hemodialysis patients: associations with mortality, atherosclerosis and cardiac function.

BACKGROUND: To assess whether serum osteoprotegerin (OPG) and/or fetuin-A predict mortality and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Multicenter, observational, prospective study that included 220 hemodialysis patients followed up for up to 6 years. Serum OPG and fetuin-A levels were measured at baseline and their possible association with clinical characteristics, CV risk biomarkers, carotid ultrasonographic findings, as well as their association with overall and CV mortality and CV events were assessed. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 3.22 ± 1.91 years, there were 74 deaths (33.6%) and 86 new cardiovascular events. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the highest tertile of OPG levels was associated with higher overall mortality (p = 0.005), as well as a higher, although non-significant, incidence of CV events and CV mortality. In contrast, fetuin-A levels did not predict any of these events. OPG levels were directly associated with age, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), prevalent cardiovascular disease, carotid intima-media thickness, adiponectin, troponin-I and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). OPG showed a negative correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and phosphate levels. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, all-cause mortality was associated with the highest tertile of OPG (HR:1.957, p = 0.018), age (HR:1.031, p = 0.036), smoking history (HR:2.122, p = 0.005), the CCI (HR:1.254, p = 0.004), troponin-I (HR:3.894, p = 0.042), IL-18 (HR:1.061, p < 0.001) and albumin levels (HR:0.886, p < 0.001). In the bootstrapping Cox regression analysis, the best cut-off value of OPG associated with mortality was 17.69 pmol/L (95%CI: 5.1-18.02). CONCLUSIONS: OPG, but not fetuin-A levels, are independently associated with overall mortality, as well as clinical and subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiac function, in prevalent hemodialysis patients.